Back to list of posts...
Greenfield, MA, 1.8.11 AND 1.9.11
January 10th, 2011
My experience of these two gigs was similar enough that I feel like they belong in one post; the fact that they happened in the same hall gives me an additional reason to pair them.
I was thinking this morning about how many cliches I could apply to my performance over the last two days. Here are a few that I came up with that seem appropriate:
You win some, you lose some.
You are your own worst critic.
You can please some of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.
Suffice it to say, I didn’t measure up to my own high standards; but I know people still had fun, and I didn’t do any permanent damage to my reputation as a caller. There are times when I find it really easy to stumble and recover in public, an important skill to have in this profession. I had the stumbling part DOWN over the last two gigs; the recovery was mostly absent.
MY PROGRAMS:
EXTRAVADANCE, 1.8.11
Pooh Bear’s Holiday – Robert Cromartie
Expert Bits – Peter Stix
Hoody’s Peanuts – John Coffman
Balance and Bounce - Marty Fager, var. Nils Fredland
Perceptual Motion (patter square) - Tom Hinds
Petronella Jig - Becky Hill, var. Nils Fredland
Ring Around the Daisy - Shawn Brenneman, var. Nils Fredland
Jim’s Whim - Rich McMath
Slapping the Wood - Don Flaherty
SQUAREBALL, 1.9.11
Nelly Bly (singing square)
Kimmswick Express (patter square), w/ circle and swing (break) - Gene Hubert
The Auctioneer (singing square)
Trip Around the Moon (patter square), w/ chain all eight (break) - Tom Hinds
Marianne (singing square)
Java Jive (singing square)
Four Square (patter square), w/ hash break - Ron Buchanan
I Don’t Know Why (singing square)
As I look at these programs, it’s hard for me to pinpoint exactly what went wrong. During the Extravadance, I got de-railed during Hoody’s Peanuts, a new dance (to me) that looks great on paper (lots of neighbor interaction, smooth and constant motion, nice transitions); but the things that seemed right to me about the dance ahead of time didn’t translate to the floor, and there was nothing I could do except end it sooner than I otherwise would have, and move on to a sure-fire dance from my repertoire. I did that with Balance and Bounce, except I chose to try out a variation of the choreography that didn’t work in the way I expected it to. It was still a good dance, but I was disappointed with my judgement in the moment. Next I called Tom’s square, Perceptual Motion, my delivery of which didn’t convert any square-skeptics. The highlight in the latter part of the program was certainly Jim’s Whim, which provided good choreographic variation (the first gypsy and swing of the night, the first star of the night, a square through to progress). Once my portion of the program was over, I got to sit back and witness one of my calling idols work her magic with the crowd…which was awesome, albeit a little difficult given my minor crisis of confidence.
The following day, I headed back to the same hall to share an afternoon of squares with a good friend and calling colleague. He and I talked ahead of time, and resolved to be relaxed and happy in our calling responsibilities. No pressure, self-imposed or otherwise…good times all around. That was the case for the most part, and I did have fun. The personal lesson I took from the afternoon, however, is that calling squares takes practice…LOTS of practice. I discovered fairly quickly that I haven’t been practicing, and it really showed. There were high points, certainly: Nelly Bly, The Auctioneer, Marianne, and Kimmswick Express went about as well as they ever have. I laid myself bare on Trip Around the Moon (which I had danced once before to aforementioned calling idol, but had never called myself…); thanks to the patience and helpful nature of the dancers in the hall, I learned how to teach the figure so that it will be much better next time. My biggest “oops” of the afternoon was Java Jive (another new one to me), which looked fairly straightforward on paper but proved to be anything but; my whole-y unsuccessful presentation brought about a great pep-talk from Ralph Sweet, during which he basically said “don’t give up.”
I won’t give up. I’ll just practice, and try again next weekend. ‘Til next time, friends…
8 Responses to Greenfield, MA, 1.8.11 AND 1.9.11
Leave a Reply


We all have our off nights – but I highly doubt there’s very little that would damage your reputation as a caller. I really enjoy your blog!
Thanks, Perry. Nice to see you earlier this month! I’m looking forward to multiple trips to the mid-Atlantic in the next year. Including, of course, Baltimore in a few weeks. ‘Til then…
I sure didn’t notice any problems on Saturday evening so I’ll paraphrase what my wise wife tells me when I criticize my cooking out loud. Shut up. It’s good.
Mind you, I’m not going to stop my critiques of my cooking because that’s how I improve. I just keep it to myself.
It’s good advice. I know you’re right, and I’ll make an effort in future posts to stick more to facts and less to associated feelings…it’s a delicate balance in a blog. I appreciate that you took the time to read, Ralph!
I’m still sorry I missed Saturday night! (I’m not a huge square fan, so missing Sunday was easier) In my opinion, Nils, an off night from you is still pretty darn good!
Having danced to your calling three times in the past three days, you’re definitely too hard on yourself, at least from the dancers’ perspective. On the other hand, that’s probably part of why you’re so good!
Looking forward to next time – Liz
Have to say I really doubt that you are often as bad as you sometimes seem to think you are. In fact I doubt if you are really ever bad at all. As a self-criticizing champion myself, I could point out that you should take your own advice and relax. When you find out more about how to do that, of course, let us all know. I for one hope that you do not edit out the feelings. And I take “Shut up, you’re good” to mean hey man, you’re great rather than hey man, shut up. No need to shut up, of that I am very sure. With affection, which makes us all better,
Rickey
This thread is fascinating and enlightening. I find it really easy to go over the top with self-criticism and assume it’s only natural because I have so much less experience than you. It’s refreshing in an odd sort of way to hear that you still go through that so much, Nils. Indeed, I believe self-monitoring is useful for continuing improvement…and I can only hope it continues to work well on me in the next few years as it has up to now.
I was not at Greenfield but at home in Virginia. But this post reminded me of the negative tone towards your judgment in the blog post about Glen Echo on Jan. 2. When I read that I definitely remember thinking, “There was a problem? What problem? It was perfect and he made it seem effortless!”